Following widespread
criticism over the supposed passage of child marriage law in Nigeria, the
senate has said it has not pass the law but was misunderstood by Nigerians.
Senator Atiku Buguda and Senator Akin Odunsi have claimed
that the Nigeria's senate has not passed the child marriage law. They argued
that their debate in the Upper chamber was misconstrued by Nigerians.
They noted that the voting on amendment to Section 29 of the
Constitution which defined the age when a person comes to a full age, with an
addition spelling out that a woman who is married is deemed to be of full age
does not mean the passage of child marriage law.
Senator Buguda said, “The argument that brought about this
furore is the renunciation of citizenship. There was an attempt to remove its
second element which relates to a woman who is married and that failed. It is a
total misrepresentation that the Senate has approved child marriage. Marriage
is regulated by the Marriage Act, Islamic laws and Customary Law. What you find
missing in these laws is the absence of the definition of the age of marriage. Around
the world, marriage below the age of 18 is allowed. I am not saying that it is
right, but it is allowed. We were not debating child marriage, and that is not
what we contemplated”.
Senator Akin Odunsi, (Ogun West) added that the Senate could
not raise the number of votes needed to delete the section.
The lawmaker noted that public reaction tended to indicate
that the Senate inserted the clause into the Constitution.
He insisted that it was wrong to say that the Senate passed
a law on child marriage.
